Vol.39 Issue.1, 2020
The Development Trajectory of Dynamic Capability - Main Path Analysis
Abstract
Purpose – This study reviews articles in the dynamic capability (DC) literature and proposes an alternative method, key-route main path analysis, to reduce the effect of sample selection bias in prior research approaches.
Design/methodology/approach – This research uses the keywords "dynamic capabilities" and "dynamic capability" to collect literature from the WOS and Scopus databases, building a citation network. By combining the main path analysis and test-mining for literature review, this study reveals the global main path and branch paths.
Findings – This study discovers that the development trajectory can be separated into three phases: the initial phase, the diverged phase, and the converged phase. There are two branches in the diverged phase: major main path (Macro/Collected-orientation) and minor secondary main path (Micro/Cognition-orientation).
Research limitations/implications – Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus are used for searching the literature, with a limited scope of journal and review articles in management and business fields. The co-word analysis is conducted with top 100 indexing terms.
Practical implications/Social implications – This study shows that most previous literature focused much more on macro/collective research than on micro/cognition research. The discovery deserves more attention and further endeavors, especially in cases of cross-level integration.
Originality/value – This study contributes to suggest the key-route main path of development trajectories of the DC literature and the same research methodology can be applied to other research fields.
Keywords – Dynamic Capabilities, Main Path Analysis, Key-Route Main Path, Microfoundation, Micro/Cognition-Orientation
Citation
Peter C. T. Lee, Louis Y. Y. Lu & John S. Liu (2020), "The Development Trajectory of Dynamic Capability - Main Path Analysis," Management Review, 39(1), 87-102. https://doi.org/10.6656/MR.202001_39(1).ENG087